文章摘要

肖鹏,潘燕桃,张久珍.中国大陆大学生学术阅读载体偏好与行为研究:基于全球调查数据的比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2018,44(1):62~75
中国大陆大学生学术阅读载体偏好与行为研究:基于全球调查数据的比较研究
A Study of University and College Students Academic Reading Format Preference and Behavior in Mainland China:A Comparative Research Supported by Global Survey Data
投稿时间:2017-10-30  
DOI:
中文关键词: 学术阅读载体  阅读载体偏好  阅读行为  大学生
英文关键词: Academic reading format preference  Reading format preference  Reading behavior  University and college students
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
肖鹏 中山大学资讯管理学院 广东 广州 510006 xiaop25@mail.sysu.edu.cn,xiaop25@mail.sysu.edu.cn 
潘燕桃 中山大学资讯管理学院 广东 广州 510006  
张久珍 北京大学信息管理系 北京 100871  
摘要点击次数: 3288
全文下载次数: 1505
中文摘要:
      “学术阅读载体国际研究”计划是一项由全球36个国家或地区参与的大型研究项目,目的在于探讨大学生学术阅读过程中对纸质与数字文本的载体偏好及相应的信息行为。中国研究团队除了利用通用的“学术阅读调查问卷”获取来自于16个省市/直辖区的1 165份调研样本,还对5个学校的40名在校大学生进行了深度访谈,以构建解释路径。研究发现:中国大学生群体进行学术相关阅读活动时,多数偏好使用纸质载体;中国大学生群体正在逐步培育起独特的数字学术阅读行为与习惯,这与中国独特的互联网环境有密切关系。由此,研究团队对学术型图书馆提出行动建议:保证纸质书刊的基本购置;在信息素养教育中,强化大学生的数字学术素养;密切关注服务群体的阅读载体偏好变化,通过充分的数据来辅助决策管理。图7。表2。参考文献31。
英文摘要:
The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS) is an international research project which so far includes researchers from 36 different countries or regions. The purpose of such a project is to explorer university and college students preference for academic reading format and information behaviors. Mainland China is one of the earliest countries/regions that involved in the ARFIS project. Based on the brief report published on the European Conference on Information Literacy 2017, the article shed light on the results of China's ARFIS research team and compares that with the world's average survey data. Adopting the Academic Reading Questionnaire, the ARFIS research team of mainland China collects 1 165 valid samples from 16 provinces/municipalities. The authors re organize the traditional analysis framework of ARFIS, and discuss the result from 5 aspects, including: 1) University and college students general preference on the academic reading format; 2) University and college students recognition on the relationship between academic reading format and learning effect; 3) The relevance of learning behavior and academic reading format; 4) Influence factors on academic reading format preference, such as language, length of the text and the convenience of reading format; 5) University and college students usage on different digital devices. However, the result above could only reveal the general situation of students academic reading preference but impossible to reach the crux of the matter. Therefore, in depth interviews are also performed on 40 students from 5 universities for further explanation. In the procedure of qualitative interviews, the researchers pay special attention to questions that show the differences of reading format preference between China and the other parts of the world, such as Chinese students particular preference on using the cellphone as an academic reading device. Combing the result of quantitative and qualitative research, the findings of the article are twofold: 1) China's university and college students still prefer paper materials in academic reading, same as most countries of the world; 2) The academic reading format preference and information behavior of China's university and college students has close relationship to do with China's unique culture context and internet environment. The research team comes up with 3 suggestions for academic libraries in China. First, the purchases of paper materials are still important for academic libraries. Secondly, it's necessary to transform and renew the outdated framework in information literacy education, and show great concern for students academic abilities in the digital age. And the last one is to stay close to student users and build up a data driven decision making system for academic librarians. 7 figs. 2 tabs. 31 refs.



查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器