| 段双喜.高校中文电子书馆配形势与纸电配合策略[J].中国图书馆学报,2018,44(1):109~122 |
| 高校中文电子书馆配形势与纸电配合策略 |
| The Situation of Library Matching Market of Chinese Electronic Books and the Co operative Strategy Between Electronic Books and Paper Books |
| 投稿时间：2017-09-17 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 电子书 馆藏建设 纸电配合 馆配平台 |
| 英文关键词: Electronic book Collection building Paper book Library oriented platform |
| 基金项目:本文系教育部高校图工委文献资源发展研究课题“研究型图书馆纸质中文图书‘单复本’修正模式的意义及其实施”（批准号:17TGW01006 ）研究成果之一 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2784 |
| 全文下载次数: 1115 |
| 中文摘要: |
中文电子书发售是当前大陆图书馆界迫切需要解决的基础性难题,馆配商推出单种零售平台服务来应对。本研究以书目比较法进行实证分析,比较各平台图书的时段、上书时滞,对国内三类中文电子书平台进行具体细致的比较,以分析当前馆配形势,探讨解决之道。数据表明近年来零售的电子新书量已超过数据库包库采购。目前,馆配商平台在纸本书出版一年内基本无法采购到相应的电子书,出版社第二至四年内才可能会渐次发售电子本,而面向个人用户的零售平台则能提供一些短时滞的电子本。高校馆可以率先采取“单纸本”策略,以消除出版方惜售电子本的心理。馆配商可借鉴个人定位平台的运作方式,以提高热门电子书的供应时效。表5。参考文献35。
|
| 英文摘要: |
Recently, on the one hand, libraries in China face increasing pressures on shortage of budget and physical space, and the PDA (Patron Driven Acquisition) model is in urgent need. On the other hand, librarians have no choice but to purchase aggregator packages when Chinese e books are recommended for a long time. Therefore, In the last few years, Chinese e book vendors have been launching various sale platforms and attempting new ways by selling electronic copies in retail. That means collection development librarians should identify its future so as to figure out what to do.
In terms of bibliography comparison, the article compares four kinds of Chinese e book bibliographies from their publishers, publication and date, including category A: bibliographies from database of e book package; category B: those from e book platforms with retail sale which is library oriented; category C: those from e book platforms with retail sale which is not library oriented but individual oriented; and category D: those from the paper books of University libraries, The data cut off time was as of April 2017.
The contrast of data from 2010 to 2016 shows that the lately launched Chinese e books are mostly available in category B, the library oriented platform with retail sale, rather than category A, the platforms with e book package. The available e books in category A have been less than those in category B in the first four years backstepping from April 2017, and in terms of e book bibliographies appropriate for East China Normal University (ECNU) library, which is a prestigious university in suburban Minhang District in Shanghai, the amount in category B has always far outstripped that in category A. The amount of e book bibliographies in category B has exceeded that in category A whatever it is in the total amount of e books, supply amount from core publishers or selected amount by mainland university libraries. However, from platforms of category B, university libraries have no way to obtain most of the Chinese electronic formats of the paper publication in the first year, because publishers may not put most electronic copies on sale until the second to the four years after the publication of printed format.
Statistics indicates that the monopolization of Chinese e books bundled in package breaks down, but the publishers have scruples about retailing electronic copies synchronously with printed format. So the article suggests that university libraries should act as pioneers to jointly take the strategy ‘Single copy policy of Chinese paper books’, so as to underline their role in the whole supply chain of Chinese e books from the perspective of integration of printed books and electronic copies as well as check and balance on interest chains, eliminate the publisher's reluctance to sell the electronic format and finally underpin the sound and rapid development of domestic library oriented market.
However, the study, because of its limited space, is confined to macro, rough analyses of current library oriented market on the basis of partial data. And precise figures are needed for a further and rigorous inquiry. 5 tabs. 35 refs.
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
