| 赵宇翔,张妍,夏翠娟,刘炜.数字人文视域下文化记忆机构价值共创研究及实践述评[J].中国图书馆学报,2023,49(1):99~117 |
| 数字人文视域下文化记忆机构价值共创研究及实践述评 |
| Value Co creation of Cultural Memory Institutions in the Domain of Digital Humanities:A Review of Research and Practice |
| 投稿时间：2022-05-09 修订日期：2022-06-13 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 文化记忆机构 GLAM 价值共创 数字人文 研究述评 |
| 英文关键词: Cultural memory institutions GLAM Value co creation Digital humanities Thematic review |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 584 |
| 全文下载次数: 402 |
| 中文摘要: |
在公共文化服务领域,展览馆、图书馆、档案馆、博物馆（GLAM）等文化记忆机构在数字化转型和升级的进程中存在原始文化资源体量庞大、结构复杂、互操作性弱等问题。为了充分挖掘文化大数据的潜在价值,文化记忆机构开始开放和共享数据,并借助公众智慧实现价值共创和协同创新。本文首先对价值共创的概念演化进行溯源,并对GLAM价值共创的概念进行界定；其次,从资源整合、机构融合、用户服务三个层面,系统梳理数字人文视域下GLAM机构价值共创研究的相关主题；再次,探索当前文化记忆机构价值共创的主要实践模式,包括数据驱动型、平台驱动型、社区驱动型三种；最后,从GLAM价值共创模型的情境化构建、数字人文视域下价值共创的赋能探索以及评价体系构建三个方面对未来研究进行展望,以期为未来数字人文视域下的价值共创相关理论研究与实践创新提供参考。图5。表2。参考文献97。
|
| 英文摘要: |
With the development of big data and the popularization of digital technology,data intensive research paradigms have gradually penetrated into the humanities. An increasing number of knowledge service institutions have carried out digital humanities oriented research. In the field of public cultural services,cultural memory institutions found that primitive cultural resources had problems such as huge volumes and complex structures during the process of migration and transformation to digital communities. In order to fully uncover the potential value of cultural big data,with the help of crowd wisdom,cultural memory institutions began to open and share data,which achieves value co creation and collaborative innovation.
The purpose of this paper is to review current research and the value co creation in GLAM. Firstly,this paper reviewed the conceptual development of value co creation,and defined the meaning of value co creation in GLAM. Secondly,three related themes regarding value co creation in GLAM,including the integration of cultural heritage resources,the convergence of cultural memory institutions,and the innovation in user services,were identified based on the perspective of digital humanities. Thirdly,this paper explored three types of current practical modes of value co creation in cultural memory institutions,ie,data driven,platform driven,and community driven. This paper provides a frontier outlook to examine the domain characteristics and value empowerment of value co creation from the perspective of digital humanities. Further research should be carried out to contextually establish the value co creation theoretical model and construct an evaluation system. The research findings are of great significance for clarifying the development context of value co creation theory,understanding the current research status of value co creation in cultural memory institutions,and providing reference for the related practices of value co creation under the vision of digital humanities. 5 figs. 2 tabs. 97 refs.
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
