| 刘宇,叶继元,袁曦临.实证缺失的中国图书馆学研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2009,35(4): |
| Lack of Empirical Research in Chinese Library Science |
| 实证缺失的中国图书馆学研究 |
| |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Empirical research,Library science,Chinese library science |
| 中文关键词: 实证研究,图书馆学,中国图书馆学 |
| 基金项目:本文系教育部人文社会科学研究项目“推进哲学社会科学学科体系、学术观点、科研方法创新研究”（项目号：2008JYJW028）的研究成果之一。 |
|
| Hits: 6255 |
| Download times: 3455 |
| Abstract: |
| The practical property of library science determined that its main research methodology is empirical method. However, in China，the main pattern of library research are experiential research and normative research. By the analysis on Chinese scholarly journals of library science, the author finds that there are serious problems of empirical research lack. Further more, lots of scholars of library science also have some mistaken cognitions on empirical research, such as “the survey on social status is empirical research” and “only quantitative research is empirical research”. The author makes a conclusion that the best way of empirical research is to conduct extensive academic cooperation and collaboration, and pay more attention to the original data from empirical research in the scientific research evaluation system. 1 tab.1 fig. 18 refs. |
| 中文摘要: |
| 图书馆学的实践性决定图书馆学研究的主流范式是实证研究，然而长期以来我国图书馆学研究的主流范式是经验性研究和规范性研究。通过对我国图书馆学学术期刊的分析，得知我国图书馆学研究存在严重的实证研究缺失现象；而且，我国图书馆学研究人员对实证研究存在认识误区，“认为对社会现状的调查就是实证研究”、“只有定量研究才是实证研究”。因此，笔者认为只有通过学术分工，由学术科研团队承担实证研究的重任，并在科研评价系统中对原始数据的创新给予重视和肯定等方式，才能促进我国图书馆学实证研究的发展。图1。表1。参考文献18。 |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
