| 傅荣贤.实然的超越和应然的解说：图书馆学如何提高学科地位[J].中国图书馆学报,2009,35(5): |
| The Transcendence as Is and the Interpretation as Ought to Be: How to Improve the Disciplinary Status of Library Science |
| 实然的超越和应然的解说：图书馆学如何提高学科地位 |
| |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Library science,Disciplinary status,Knowledge as is,Knowledge as ought to be |
| 中文关键词: 图书馆学，学科地位，实然知识，应然知识， |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 3846 |
| Download times: 3373 |
| Abstract: |
| As a result of the narrow understanding of library services and the infatuation with the scientific and rational methods in the library science research, the library science study can only discuss the library as it “is”. As a matter of fact, a comprehensive study of the library science must reflect the double self consciousness of what is and what ought to be. It is not only necessary to build a disciplinary knowledge system as is, which can directly respond to the specific operation of collecting, organizing, storing and using resources, but also to pursue the possibilities and limits of human culture through the reflection on the culture behind the resources and achieve the transcendental awareness and infinite insight of culture. The course of library science development shows that only by extending from the emotional experience of the fact as is to the ontological reflection of the value as ought to be, can the library science establish an academic field with the internal logic unity, provide independent results that can be shared by other disciplines and truly improve its own disciplinary status. 29 refs. |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对图书馆实践的狭隘认识以及对图书馆学研究中科学理性方法的过度迷恋，导致图书馆学研究只能在实然的层面上讨论图书馆之所“是”。完整的图书馆学研究必须体现实然和应然的双重自觉：既要建构一个旨在直接回应文献收集、整理、保存和利用等具体操作的实然的学科知识体系，又要通过对文献背后文化的思考，追问人类文化的可能性及其限度，形成关于文化的超越性认识和无限性洞见。图书馆学的发展历程表明，只有从感性经验的实然事实层面延展到本体反思的应然价值层面，图书馆学才能建构一个具有内在逻辑统一性的学术领域，提供能够为其他学科所共享的自 |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
