| 刘宇,叶继元,袁曦临.图书情报学期刊的分层结构：基于同行评议的实证研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2011,37(2): |
| Hierarchical Structure of Library and Information Science Journals: An Empirical Study Based on Peer Review |
| 图书情报学期刊的分层结构：基于同行评议的实证研究 |
| |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Journal evaluation, Library and information science, Academic status, Peer review. |
| 中文关键词: 期刊评价，图书情报学，学术地位，同行评议 |
| 基金项目:本文系国家社科基金重大项目“建立和完善哲学社会科学评价体系研究”（项目编号：04&ZD031)的研究成果之一。 |
|
| Hits: 6622 |
| Download times: 2562 |
| Abstract: |
| Peer review is one of the mechanisms that keep research in a healthy condition, and academic evaluation depends essentially upon peers’ value judgment. The paper surveys the academic community’s perception and the recognition of 18 journals in CSSCI, and displays their differences in hierarchical structures at the category level by means of cluster analysis. The paper finds that 18 journals of library and information science are clearly divided into 4 levels, and A Guide to the Core Journals of China and CSSCI source journals can only partly reflect peers’ perception and recognition of those journals, while CSSCI’s evaluation is slightly more consistent with our findings than that of A Guide to the Core Journals of China . 7 tabs. 1 fig. 23 refs. |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议是保证科研健康发展的一种重要机制，学术评价在本质上离不开同行的判断。本文通过问卷法，采用同行评议的方式调查学术共同体对18种CSSCI图书情报学来源期刊的感知和认同，使用聚类分析展示期刊在“类”的层次上的差异。研究发现：同行将18种期刊明显地分为4个层级；《中文核心期刊要目总览》和CSSCI来源期刊均只能部分地反映同行的评议结果；CSSCI来源期刊的评价结果与同行评议结果一致性略高于《中文核心期刊要目总览》。表7。图1。参考文献23。 |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
