| 周晓英,董伟,朱小梅,隋鑫.图书馆学情报学高影响力论文特征及所反映的学科差异分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(4):99~109 |
| Features and Difference Analysis of High-impact Papers in Information Science and Library Science |
| 图书馆学情报学高影响力论文特征及所反映的学科差异分析 |
| |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Library science,Information science,High impact papers,Highly cited papers,Discipline difference |
| 中文关键词: 图书馆学,情报学,高影响力论文,高被引论文,学科差异 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 4239 |
| Download times: 3302 |
| Abstract: |
| This article collected the 100 top-cited research papers in library science and information science from CNKI. Considering them as high impact papers in the two fields，we analyzed their extrinsic and content features. We defined the concepts of novelty degree and response time of highly cited papers and further defines measurements for these concepts. This paper contributes to the field by discovering writing features of highly cited papers as well as examining and exploring the differences between library science and information science on the basis of data analyses. 6 figs. 2 tabs. 19 refs. |
| 中文摘要: |
| 选取CNKI数据库中图书馆学和情报学被引频次最高的论文各100篇，作为本学科的高影响力论文，分析其外部特征和内容特征。提出了高被引论文新颖度、被引响应时间等概念并加以测度。研究发现：高影响力论文在发表后5—10年间的引用频次相对较高，两个学科的差异不大；具有指导性、方法论价值的论文更有高被引的可能；探索问题广泛、细致、深入的综述性论文有高被引的可能。两学科的差异在于：图书馆学研究内容相对集中，情报学研究跨学科的性质更为明显；图书馆学实践性特征较明显，情报学多体现出纯科学的特征；情报学文献的被引老化时间要长于图书馆学；两学科就共同关注的问题所采取的研究思路和研究角度不完全相同。图6。表2。参考文献19。 |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
