魏群义,袁芳,贾欢,霍然,侯桂楠,杨新涯.我国移动图书馆服务现状调查[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(3):50~63
Mobile Library Service of the National Library of China and the Provincial Public Libraries
我国移动图书馆服务现状调查
Received:July 25, 2013  Revised:December 08, 2013
DOI：
Key words:Mobile library  Public library  Mobile service
中文关键词:  移动图书馆  公共图书馆  移动服务
基金项目:本文系国家社科基金西部项目“移动图书馆云服务SAAS模型研究”(项目编号:12XTQ003)和重庆市社会科学规划项目“泛在信息环境下重庆市移动阅读研究”(项目编号:2011YBCB057)的研究成果之一。
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Wei Qunyi 重庆大学图书,重庆沙正街,400044 wqy@cqu.edu.cn 
Yuan Fang 南昌大学图书馆,江西 南昌,330031  
Jia Huan 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆,400044  
Huo Ran 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆,400044  
Hou Guinan 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆,400044  
Yang Xinya 重庆大学图书,重庆沙正街,400044  
Hits: 4899
Download times: 2143
Abstract:
Based on the method of online investigation, questionnaires and effectiveness tests, we investigated the national library and thirty-one provincial public libraries for evaluating current status of mobile library. Comparative analysis of mobile service was carried out between the public libraries of China and the top 25US public libraries. The result shows that:currently, mobile service in China is less widespread and the mode of mobile service mainly focuses on WAP and APP; mobile libraries provide diverse mobile services and abundant library resources, and the service is personalized and interactive. However, the process of mobile library service is not faultless, and mobile service lacks novelty, and has low awareness and insufficient effectiveness. Both Chinese and American public libraries have some advantages. Public libraries in China provide more rich services and resources. And mobile services among US public libraries possess more humanization and refinement. Mobile services are better combined with the mobile terminals, and have a rich collection of information display. 6figs. 3tabs. 37refs.
中文摘要:
      以国家图书馆和31家省级公共图书馆为研究对象,采用网络调研、问卷调查、有效性测试等方法,对中国图书馆的移动服务现状进行调研,并与美国排名前25位的公共图书馆的移动服务进行对比分析。结果表明:中国公共图书馆移动服务普及率偏低,服务模式主要为WAP和APP；移动服务和移动资源 较为丰富,移动服务具有良好的个性和交互性,但存在移动服务体系不完整、移动服务缺乏创新性、知晓度较低、有效性整体不高等问题。中美公共图书馆的移动服务各有所长,中国图书馆提供了更为丰富的移动服务和移动资源,而美国图书馆移动服务更加人性化和精细化,与移动终端结合得更好,馆藏信息的展示效果较好。图6。表3。参考文献37。
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader