马雨萌,黄金霞.iAuthor面向机构科研评价的应用实现[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(2):97~108
Realization of Application of iAuthor on Research Evaluation of Institutions
iAuthor面向机构科研评价的应用实现
Received:September 28, 2015  
DOI:10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.162007
Key words:Research evaluation of institution  ORCID  iAuthor  Evaluation indicators  Functional framework
中文关键词:  机构科研评价  ORCID  iAuthor  评价指标  功能框架
基金项目:本文系中国科学院规划与决策科技支持系统建设项目“研究作者标识体系中国服务平台iAuthor”(编号:院1409)的研究成果之一
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
MA Yumeng 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190 mayumeng@mail.las.ac.cn 
HUANG Jinxia 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190  
Hits: 3651
Download times: 1800
Abstract:
As an important tool for research management and performance management of institution, research evaluation plays a role in measuring the impact of research activities of institution, through the establishment of a scientific evaluation indicators system. In the environment of open academic movement and networked scientific communication, with altmetrics, eurekometrics, erevnametrics having gradually grown up, research evaluation is facing the challenge of how to select and integrate multi-dimensional evaluation data from the massive growth of data.
    As a general international standard for researcher identifier, ORCID has become a middleware to support integration and interoperation of rich evaluation data. The values of ORCID in application for research evaluation shows that ORCID can provide a new solution for multi-dimensional evaluation of institution in the varying environment of academic communication and evaluation system, including unique identification, data resource linked, varieties of research outputs supported. Therefore, it is concluded that iAuthor (also called “Chinese Scientists Online”) based on ORCID shows broad application prospects in research evaluation of institution.
    Combining with the construction mechanism and system function of iAuthor and ORCID, the design principles of research evaluation indicators are made to provide a scientific and reasonable selection basis of indicators. The paper builds a system of multi-dimensional evaluation indicators which can be applied to domestic institutes and universities based on iAuthor; specific indicators included in each evaluation dimension are as follows. 1) Bibliometrics dimension: varieties of articles and citations of Web of Science and CSCD are used, as well as the highly cited papers, articles published in journals with higher impact factor and h index. 2) Cybermetrics dimension: learning from the “Ranking Web of World Research Centers” initiated by Cybermetrics Labin Spain, the volume of the different resources and the number of papers retrieved in Google Scholar are set. 3) Altmetrics dimension: ORCID has achieved information interaction with varieties of new social media. According to PLoS “article-level metrics”(ALM) and altmetrics indicators system of ImpactStory and Plum Analytics, altmetrics indicators are selected from the dimensions of used, recommended, saved and social media. 4) Fund and project: learning from the fund dimension put forward by UberResearch, a series of indicators for institution are designed, including the number of projects, project output, etc. 5) Other dimensions: the paper also builds the indicators system to reflect a high level of talent team, awards and infrastructure construction for research institution. In order to make the above indicators system apply in iAuthor and sustainably support services of research evaluation of institution to satisfy user’s individualized demand, the paper proposes the future development directions of iAuthor including building sustainable framework of research evaluation, extending diversified forms of value-added services, strengthening institutional administrator’s responsibilities. 1 fig. 1 tab. 32 refs.
中文摘要:
      科研评价作为机构科研管理和绩效管理的重要工具,可通过建立科学合理的评价指标体系,对机构科研活动的影响进行衡量。综览现有机构科研评价活动、评价方法及其指标,可以发现机构科研评价需要多维度的评价指标体系,新型科研成果成为重要的评价对象,评价对象的唯一标识促进评价数据的准确集成,评价数据应保证可持续获取并与组织相关联。而基于ORCID在唯一标识、关联数据源、支持多类型科研产出等方面的应用价值,新学术交流环境下基于ORCID的iAuthor在机构科研评价中具有较好的应用前景。本文依据制定的科研评价指标的设计原则,从文献计量、网络计量、替代计量、基金项目等维度构建基于iAuthor的机构科研评价指标体系,为国内科研机构和高校开展科研评价提供新思路。iAuthor的未来发展方向包括建设可持续性的科研评价框架,扩展多样化的增值服务形式,加强机构管理员的职责。图1。表1。参考文献32。
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader