| 曹磊.小型免费图书馆运动回顾与思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2020,46(6):121~131 |
| Review and Reflections on Little Free Libraries |
| 小型免费图书馆运动回顾与思考 |
| Received:February 03, 2020 Revised:July 20, 2020 |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Little free libraries Book desert Non-profit organization Public libraries USA |
| 中文关键词: 小型免费图书馆 图书沙漠 非营利组织 公共图书馆 美国 |
| 基金项目:本文系国家社会科学基金项目“中国农村公共阅读服务体系研究”（编号:14BTQ05）的研究成果之一 |
|
| Hits: 778 |
| Download times: 497 |
| Abstract: |
Since 2009,Little Free Libraries （LFL for short） started in the United States and set off a wave of book sharing around the world The rise of this movement is directly related to the tradition of American charity culture and the spread of book desert In more than 10 years of development,LFL （Little Free Library,hereinafter referred to as LFL,a non profit organization that promotes LFL） has adopted the form of social enterprise organization and has developed rapidly with simple methods and clear concepts The movement was appreciated by the mainstream media and library community.
Academic research shows that:1） The movement has the positive significance of encouraging book sharing,promoting community building,and promoting grassroots charity activities and fighting against capitalism；2） The movement has the problem of pursuing commercial interests,the unreasonable geographical layout,the questionable participants goals,affecting intellectual freedom,and doing nothing to solve social problems；3） The movement should make use of urban planning theory and technology,and strengthen cooperation with public libraries to achieve better development.
In-depth thinking about the LFL movement shows that:1）The combined effect of economic factor （income inequality） and political factor （neoliberalism） caused the spread of book desert；2） LFL movement needs to learn from operation mode of Carnegie Library,pay attention to LFL owners and book resources,and think about the organization's own construction；3） Public libraries should cooperate with LFL movement,grasp the general tone of public welfare,and pay attention to social issues；4） Fundamentally solving book desert needs participation of the whole society led by government52 refs.
|
| 中文摘要: |
2009年,Little Free Libraries（小型免费图书馆）在美国出现并快速发展,之后在世界各地掀起了一阵图书共享的风潮。这一运动的兴起,与美国慈善文化的传统和“图书沙漠”现象的蔓延有直接联系。在十多年的发展历程中,LFL采用社会企业组织形式,因其简单的方法、明确的理念而得到快速发展,获得主流媒体和图书馆界的赞扬。学界的研究表明:①LFL运动具有鼓励图书共享、促进社区构建、助推草根公益活动、对抗资本主义等积极意义；②LFL运动存在追求商业利益、布局不尽合理、参与者目的存疑、影响知识自由和无助于解决社会问题等不足；③LFL运动应当利用城市规划理论和技术,通过加强与公共图书馆的合作来取得更好的发展。本文对LFL运动进行深入思考,认为:①经济因素（收入不平等）和政治因素（新自由主义）的共同作用造成了“图书沙漠”现象的蔓延；②LFL运动需要借鉴卡内基图书馆的运作模式,关注运营者和图书资源,思考组织自身建设；③公共图书馆应当与LFL运动合作,把握公益性的总基调,关注社会问题；④从根本上解决“图书沙漠”现象离不开政府主导的全社会共同参与。参考文献52。
|
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
|
|
|
