| 魏辅轶.中国图书馆学理论跨世纪的三次“重逢”与“莫比乌斯陷阱”[J].中国图书馆学报,2021,47(1):34~46 |
| Three “Reunions” Cross One Century and “Mobius Trap” of Chinese Library Science Theory |
| 中国图书馆学理论跨世纪的三次“重逢”与“莫比乌斯陷阱” |
| Received:May 25, 2020 Revised:July 31, 2020 |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Library science theory Knowledge communication Knowledge service Library 2.0 Information resource management Elements theory Document resources Mobius |
| 中文关键词: 图书馆学理论 知识交流 知识服务 图书馆2.0 信息资源管理 要素说 文献资源 莫比乌斯 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 1225 |
| Download times: 672 |
| Abstract: |
This paper studies the phenomenon of three “reunions” of the representative theories of resource,service and technology in the development of Chinese library science theory from the 20th century to the 21st century. The study analyzes the three collisions of the theory of library science between Zhang Xiaolin and Mi Hao,Fan Bingsi and Meng Guangjun,Cheng Huanwen and Du Dingyou in terms of logical basis,historical origin and social influence. First of all,this paper studies the unexpected reunion of “knowledge service” and “knowledge exchange”,reflecting the different interpretations of knowledge elements in library science by two scholars in different time and space. Secondly,it studies the inevitable meeting of “Library 2.0” and “information resource management” on the road of technological development. Thirdly,it studies the active encounter of “Resource is king” and “three elements”. At the same time,the study analyzes the reason why the knowledge service fails to be implemented in the library due to the lack of demand research and excessive personal dependence. Based on the theory of Web 2.0,it puts forward that “Library 2.0” movement is a library decentralization movement,and analyzes the positive and negative effects of “Library 2.0” movement on library talents. This paper studies the historical reasons for the rise of the root seeking trend marked by “Resource is king” and analyzes the cost difficulties and theoretical doubts in the development of the root seeking trend. Through the display of time clues,this paper points out that the development of Chinese library science theory may fall into a “Mobius trap”. In the trap,the development of theory shows the characteristics of periodic repetition,and the new theory lacks the necessary development space due to the reason of theoretical convergence. “Mobius trap” is formed by the continuous feedback motion formed by the tension between theories. Finally,through the analysis of the logical relationship between demand and resources,services and technology,it is concluded that demand is the core factor connecting the three fundamentals. If the three fundamentals are anchored together through demand research to form the orderly evolution and inheritance of the theory,we can break through the “Mobius trap”. The innovation of this study is to show the development cycle of basic theory of library science from a higher time dimension based on the comparison of six important nodes in the cross century theoretical development of library science. This paper creatively puts forward the “Mobius trap” of the theoretical development of library science in China,and points out the internal logical relationship among the three basic aspects of the basic theory of library science in China,and the reasons for the circulation phenomenon of the theoretical development under this logical relationship. The conclusion is that demand is the core element of anchoring the three basic aspects of library science. The demand makes the resource,service and technology of library science theory research anchor each other. Only in this way can the theoretical research of library science in China break the “Mobius trap”. 36 refs.
|
| 中文摘要: |
本文分析了张晓林和宓浩、范并思和孟广均、程焕文和杜定友这六位学者的图书馆学理论思想在逻辑基础、历史渊源和社会影响方面的三次碰撞,以及20至21世纪中国图书馆学理论发展中资源、服务和技术三个基本面代表性理论的三次“重逢”现象,即“知识服务”与“知识交流”学说的意外重逢,“图书馆20”与“信息资源管理”在技术发展道路上的必然相遇,“资源为王”与“三要素”的主动相遇。提出:知识服务未能在图书馆落地的原因在于缺乏需求研究,以及过度的个人依赖导致缺乏可以复制的成功模式；“图书馆20”运动是一场图书馆的去中心化运动,同时对图书馆人才产生了积极和消极影响；以“资源为王”为标志的寻根思潮的出现和兴起有其历史原因,但在发展中可能会遇到成本困难和理论质疑。通过时间线索的展示,提出中国图书馆学理论发展过程可能陷入了一种“莫比乌斯陷阱”,这是由理论之间的张力导致的连续反馈运动形成的。最后通过分析需求与资源、服务和技术的逻辑关系得出结论:需求是联系三个基本面的核心因素,中国图书馆学理论发展只有通过需求研究将三个基本面锚定在一起,并形成理论的有序沿革与传承,才能突破“莫比乌斯陷阱”。参考文献36。
|
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
|
|
|
