| 杨建林.基于构成维度视角的情报思维概念解析[J].中国图书馆学报,2022,48(4):52~66 |
| Analyzing the Concept of Intelligence Thinking from the Perspective of Constructing Dimensions |
| 基于构成维度视角的情报思维概念解析 |
| Received:August 23, 2021 |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Intelligence thinking Intelligence analysis Information thinking Constructing dimensions |
| 中文关键词: 情报思维 情报分析 信息思维 构成维度 |
| 基金项目:本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“面向国家战略的情报学教育与发展研究” （编号:20&ZD332）的研究成果之一 |
|
| Hits: 427 |
| Download times: 337 |
| Abstract: |
There is a consensus in the intelligence science community in China that the fusion of information paradigm and intelligence paradigm is conducive to the sustainable development of intelligence science and constitutes the general trend of the development of intelligence science in the future. The fusion of information paradigm and intelligence paradigm is essentially the fusion of intelligence thinking and information thinking.
The paper holds that intelligence thinking refers to the thinking mode with disciplinary characteristics formed by the intelligence science academic community in the long term process of solving intelligence issues. Intelligence thinking is an organic whole that includes five key dimensions: competition thinking,information thinking,systems thinking,critical thinking and all source thinking. Competition thinking is a kind of thinking mode guided by competition theory,aims to restrain rivals and develop oneself,selects effective analysis tools,senses the situation in competitive environment,reasonably participates in competition and cooperation,and thus obtains scarce resources or competitive advantages. Information thinking is a thinking mode of analyzing and solving problems formed under the guidance of information philosophy theory and information science theory. Systems thinking is a thinking mode using systems science as a tool and can be divided into three categories: holistic systems thinking,collaborative systems thinking and emergent systems thinking. Critical thinking is a thinking mode that is vigilant to and strictly manages possible flaws in the process and results of intelligence analysis. Critical thinking in intelligence thinking is integrated with evaluative thinking. All sources thinking is a thinking mode that pays attention to the participation of all stakeholders,the use of all intelligence sources,and the sharing of all intelligence analysts thoughts and resources in the process of intelligence analysis.
The paper holds that the five core dimensions of intelligence thinking are interrelated and interactive and have a global effect. Regarding the intelligence target or intelligence issue,the functions of the five dimensions of intelligence thinking can be summarized as confirming,understanding,describing,checking,and making up for omissions. Namely: the basic function of competition thinking is to determine the intelligence target or intelligence issue; the basic function of systems thinking is to understand intelligence target or intelligence issue; the basic function of information thinking is to describe intelligence target or intelligence issue; the basic function of critical thinking is to check the thinking process and thinking results of competition thinking,systems thinking,and information thinking; the basic function of all source thinking is to make up for omissions of the remaining four dimensions（to provide more resources for the intelligence process,to further improve the quality of thinking process and thinking results of competition thinking,systems thinking,information thinking and critical thinking）. 2 figs. 44 refs.
|
| 中文摘要: |
明确情报思维与信息思维的内涵及相互关系是推动信息范式与情报范式融合的一项基础性工作。本文从构成维度视角对情报思维概念的内涵进行重新解读,首先对情报学界关于信息、情报、信息思维、情报思维四个概念的现有理解进行归纳总结,然后从“竞争思维”“信息思维”“系统思维”“批判性思维”“全源性思维”五个关键维度剖析情报思维概念的内涵。研究发现,围绕情报目标或情报问题,这五个维度分别扮演着各自独特的功能角色,其中竞争思维确定情报目标或情报问题,系统思维理解情报目标或情报问题,信息思维描述情报目标或情报问题,批判性思维对各个维度的思维过程与思维结果进行把关,全源性思维对其余四个维度的功能进行补漏,它们之间相互关联、相互作用,组成了一个有机的整体。图2。参考文献44。
|
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
|
|
|
