| 冉从敬,刘妍.数据主权视野下平台治理的动力逻辑、模式选择与重构路径[J].中国图书馆学报,2024,50(1):79~95 |
| Dynamic Logic,Mode Selection,and Reconstruction Path of Platform Governance in the Perspective of Data Sovereignty |
| 数据主权视野下平台治理的动力逻辑、模式选择与重构路径 |
| Received:December 12, 2022 |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Data sovereignty Network platform Platform power Platform economy Data security Goverment governance |
| 中文关键词: 数据主权 网络平台 平台权力 平台经济 数据安全 政府治理 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 310 |
| Download times: 211 |
| Abstract: |
With the in depth transformation of Internet technology and the increasing importance of data resources,the rapid development of network platforms has facilitated people's lives,but also caused a variety of political and economic risks and uncertainties. The platforms artificially construct an internal social ecology with the help of digital technology and algorithms. This ecosystem is to a certain extent independent of the legal norms constructed by the country in practice for centuries. Thus,platforms have gained data dominated power in cyberspace,which profoundly impacts the government led national governance order and data sovereignty. Therefore,platform governance must consider the national political,economic,and even cultural capabilities in cyberspace together with data sovereignty policies. This article finds that carrying out platform governance in light of data sovereignty is an institutional need to enhance national data competitiveness,consolidate national data sovereignty authority,guarantee national data sovereignty security and promote the healthy development of the digital market. Under these four institutional dimensions,a number of cases are cited to demonstrate,and further,from the data sovereignty perspective,summarize the platform governance's theoretical logic.
From the perspective of practice,the existing platform governance models can be divided into three main categories,namely,the“top down” external mandatory supervision model of the government,the “bottom up” internal review autonomy model of the platform,and the “top bottom linkage” collaborative governance model of government-civilian cooperation. After analyzing the subjects,objects and tools of these three governance models,we find that all the existing platform governance models have defects in both subjects and tools,making it difficult to respond to the governance demands from the perspective of data sovereignty. Therefore,it is urgent to inject new platform governance spirits in response to the changes in the governance structure of cyberspace brought about by the shift of power.
This article improves the path of platform governance under the vision of data sovereignty,and proposes that the principle of data sovereignty should be embedded in the governance concept of national security and sovereign authority,and the transfer of sovereign power should be used as a tool to enhance the platform's ability to carry out legal autonomy. Meanwhile,platform behaviors guided by social responsibility should,aiming at building a sound interaction framework between a legal system centered on state power and platform rules centered on platform power,and a good platform governance model of sovereign security,balance of rights and responsibilities,vitality,and institutional justice,be cultivated while taking into account government supervision and platform self regulation. 1 tab. 50 refs.
|
| 中文摘要: |
随着互联网技术深入变革与数据资源重要性急速提升,网络平台迅猛发展,提升了社会资源的配置效率,便利了人们的生产生活,也引致了多种政治经济风险和不确定性。在数据赋能的权力结构变迁中,市场权力向占有大量数据资源的平台流动,平台权力兴起。平台权力挑战了国家数据主权的身份与权威,对网络空间国家安全与数据安全产生深刻影响。现行的政府外部强制性监管、平台内部审视性自治和官民合作协同性治理的平台治理模式在主体与工具方面均存在缺陷,难以回应数据主权视野下的治理诉求,亟需注入新的平台治理精神,以应对权力转移带来的网络空间治理结构变化。应当以数据主权为原则嵌入国家安全与主权权威的治理理念,以主权权能让渡为工具增强平台开展合法性自治的能力,同时培养以社会责任为引导的平台行为,兼顾政府监管与平台自我规制,搭建以国家权力为中心的法律制度与以平台权力为中心的平台规则的良性互动框架,追求主权安全、权责平衡、充满活力、制度正义的平台善治模式。表1。参考文献50。
|
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
|
|
|
