| 徐拥军,杨红艳,戴鹏杰,刘萍萍.中国原创研究方法评价:特征识别与标准构建[J].中国图书馆学报,2026,52(3):4~20 |
| 中国原创研究方法评价:特征识别与标准构建 |
| Evaluation of Original Research Methods in China:Characteristics Identification and Criteria Development |
| 投稿时间：2026-03-10 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 哲学社会科学 自主知识体系 原创研究方法 评价标准 原创导向 学术评价 |
| 英文关键词: Philosophy and social sciences Independent knowledge system Original research methodsEvaluation criteria Original orientation Research evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 354 |
| 全文下载次数: 184 |
| 中文摘要: |
原创研究方法是中国哲学社会科学自主知识体系的核心要素之一。随着构建中国哲学社会科学自主知识体系进程的纵深推进,原创研究方法作为一种具有突破性和引领性的重要学术成果,理应成为学术评价的重要对象。本文将中国哲学社会科学原创研究方法界定为:由中国当代哲学社会科学工作者首次提出,并已获得广泛认可与应用,具有突破性和引领性的研究方法。通过文献计量分析并结合其他多源原创学术成果数据分析,提炼出原创研究方法“形成新范式、推进新变革”的“两新”本质特征,以及“发现新原理、拓展新维度、开发新工具、建构新模式、产生新效能”的“五新”一般特征。借助专家调查法对这些特征进行科学验证,进而构建原创研究方法评价标准,通过实证检验评价标准的有效性与适用性,并遴选出10个原创研究方法示例。本文首次系统提出哲学社会科学原创研究方法的主要特征和评价标准,是原创研究方法评价的一次有益探索,为中国自主知识体系背景下的学术评价改革提供了借鉴和参考。图2。表2。参考文献23。
|
| 英文摘要: |
Original research methods constitute one of the core elements of China's independent knowledge system in the philosophy and social sciences. As the construction of this independent knowledge system accelerates,original research methods as a significant type of academic output with groundbreaking and leading value,should become an important object of research evaluation. Evaluation of original research methods is conducive to accurately assessing the original contributions of academic research,and has significant and far reaching implications for deepening research evaluation reforms,promoting academic innovation,and enhancing China's international academic discourse power. However,the current academic community still lacks theoretical analysis on the characteristics and laws of original research methods. There are no systematic and operable evaluation criteria for original research methods,nor has an evaluation system for original research methods been established.
This paper defines original research methods in Chinese philosophy and social sciences as research methods that are first proposed by contemporary Chinese researchers in the field of philosophy and social sciences,have been widely recognized and applied,and exhibit pioneering and leading characteristics. Based on a clarification of the conceptual connotation of original research methods,this study employs bibliometric analysis of reprinted papers from Renmin University of China's Selected Materials from 1995 to 2024 and combines this analysis multi source data on original academic papers. It extracts the essential “Two New” characteristics of original research methods—“forming new paradigms and advancing new transformations”—as well as the general “Five New” characteristics—“discovering new principles,expanding new dimensions,developing new tools,constructing new models,and generating new efficacies”. Using expert surveys,the study empirically validates these characteristics and subsequently establishes evaluation criteria for original research methods. Through empirical application,the effectiveness and applicability of the evaluation criteria are further verified,and ten examples of original research methods are selected:the Systematic Integrated Prediction Method,Educational Economics Methodology,Comprehensive Information Methodology,Field Politics Methodology,Wuli-Shili-Renli Systems Methodology,Contextual Analysis Method,Parallel Management Method,Quadruple Evidence Method,Covert/Dual Narrative Progression Analysis Method,and Historical Politics Methodology.
This paper is the first to systematically propose the main characteristics and evaluation criteria of original research methods in philosophy and social sciences and to conduct empirical research on their application. It represents a valuable exploration in the evaluation of original research methods and provides reference for research evaluation reforms in the context of China's independent knowledge system. 2 figs. 2 tabs. 23 refs.
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
京公网安备11010802047316号