Page 74 - Journal of Library Science in China 2020 Vol.46
P. 74

CHEN Geng & HU Yachun / The attribution analysis of low participation in public reading   073
                                       among rural residents: A survey from 77 administrative villages and rural libraries in Hubei Province


               development, 31.2%  “relatively important”, 27.2% “moderate”, 11.2% “not that important” and
               5.5% “not important at all”. There is a direct positive correlation between reading cognition and
               reading participation. Of the 845 villagers who knew the farmers’ reading room, 269 believed that
               reading was very important for personal development. In 2018, 205 of 269 villagers visited the
               farmers’ reading room to participate in public reading, accounting for 76.2%. Among the 35 people
               who considered reading as not important for personal development, only 12 visited the farmers’
               reading room in 2018, accounting for 34.3% (see Table 3). A 30-year-old mother said, “Since
               I gave birth to my child, I’ve begun to think reading is very important. So I often read books. I
               read books of any kind, and I will read whatever books I have.” But one resident, who was an
               electrician, said, “For this kind of work, all we need is skill. Reading is useless, and we don’t want
               to read.”


               Table 3. Cross table of cognition of reading’ effect and whether they have been to the farmers’ reading room in the
               village
                                          Have you ever been to the “farmers’ reading room” in 2018
                   Reading cognition                                                     Total
                                       Yes     Proportion (%)   No        Proportion (%)
                    Very important     205         76.2         64            23.8        269
                   Relatively important  202       72.4         77            27.6        279
                      Moderate         110         57.0         83            43.0        193
                   Not that important  27          39.1         42            60.9        69
                   Not important at all  12        34.3         23            65.7        35


               3.1.3  Reading effort
               Person’ efforts are the key subjective factor of public reading behavior. In the construction of
               effort indicators, we learn from Yan Hui’s digital poverty attribution analysis to decompose them
               into two dimensions: time spent and experience used (H. YAN & X.M. YAN, 2014), and integrate
               them into reading habits to measure. According to Dewey, the habit is the ability and skill formed
               by past experience. It becomes a process variable at the turning point between the past and the
               future, which is phased and adjustable. Therefore, the habit can become an active structure to face
               and solve real problems (R.D. WANG, 2019). Reading habit is such a dynamic structure. It is the
               personal experience accumulated after spending time and energy in reading, which provides basis
               and possibility for participating in public reading.
                 The survey showed that 57.8% of rural residents had the habit of reading. They did not read
               for a long time every week (64.8% of them read for less than 3 hours). They mainly read at night
               (41.0%) and before going to bed (34.3%), and the place was usually at home (78.9%). The reading
               on mobile devices such as mobile phones and iPads (59.9%) exceeded the traditional paper reading
               (54.9%). The main reading resources were news and short articles on mobile devices (63.2%)
               and books (57.6%), which were mostly from personal purchase (56.2%) and the Internet (48.4%).
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79