| 谢晓专,周晓英.国家安全情报理论的本土探索（1999—2019）:功能范式主导的情报学[J].中国图书馆学报,2021,47(3):67~83 |
| 国家安全情报理论的本土探索（1999—2019）:功能范式主导的情报学 |
| Domestic Exploration of National Security Intelligence Theory （1999-2019）: Intelligence Studies Dominated by Functional Paradigm |
| 投稿时间：2020-07-06 修订日期：2020-11-04 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 国家安全情报理论 情报学 功能范式 历史范式 |
| 英文关键词: National security intelligence theory Intelligence studies Functional paradigm Historical paradigm |
| 基金项目:本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“情报学学科建设与情报工作未来发展路径研究”（编号:17ZDA291）和北京高校高精尖学科建设项目“国家安全情报学学科建设与人才培养规格研究”（编号:2020GDLW002）的研究成果之一 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1052 |
| 全文下载次数: 689 |
| 中文摘要: |
回顾我国国家安全情报理论研究的进展、成就、特征与趋势,把握学科发展全局,有助于科学规划学科发展未来。文章采用文献计量和内容分析方法,运用“范式理论”和“结构功能理论”,分析1999—2019年间我国公开出版的国家安全情报理论文献,归纳其研究路径、内容、范式、进展、成就、特征与趋势,刻画国家安全情报学术版图。研究发现:我国国家安全情报理论研究正处于蓬勃发展期,形成了以“情报分析”为中心的系统化的学科理论体系,研究路径呈现“西学东渐”的演变脉络；研究内容可划归为“理论、史论、业务、管理、环境、规范、文化、教育、技术”九维框架；研究范式由“历史范式主导”转向“功能范式主导”,并形成了两大流派；学科建制与《国家情报法》相呼应,呈“三大分支”齐驱之势；研究力量初步形成稳定的学者队伍,主要由四类学科群体构成；学科发展向“服务国家安全与发展”的大情报学学科体系迈进,并呈现“法治、回归、融合、扩展、深化”的趋势及特点。表1。参考文献80。
|
| 英文摘要: |
This article contributes to the future development of the discipline by reviewing the research progress,characteristics and trends of national security intelligence theory in ChinaFrom 1949 to 1999,the theoretical process of National Security Intelligence Studies （NSIS） in China was slow,and the historical paradigm had dominated intelligence studies for half a centuryBased on the “paradigm theory” and “structure function theory”,this paper depicts the academic map of NSIS by summarizing its research focus,major achievements,characteristics and major issues through the content analysis of the intelligence literature published from 1999 to 2019.
It finds out that,in the past 20 years,NSIS in China flourished and has roughly presented a pattern of “three pillars” including domestic exploration,foreign research and foreign introductionIts contents can be classified into “theory,history,business,management,environment,regulation,culture,education and technology”,and breakthroughs have been made in the following three areas:1）The discipline takes shape from the fragmented “intelligence theory” to the systematic “intelligence studies”. 2）The research focus has shifted from the “intelligence collecting”to “intelligence analysis”3） The emerging branches of NSIS including public security intelligence,emergency intelligence,national defense scientific and technical intelligence,financial intelligence,open source intelligence and other branches develop vigorously. 4） The theory of intelligence history composed of the contents of the history of “ideas,technology,activities,institutions,biography of figures” is becoming mature.
NSIS in China has the following outstanding characteristics: 1） The research path presents the general feature of “eastward transmission of western sciences”. 2） Compared with the western NSIS,the research based on China's local experience is relatively few,especially lack of explanatory research,normative research,critical research,political and cultural research. 3） The research paradigm of NSIS is mainly manifested in two paradigms: historical one and functional one,and has formed “historical school” and “functional school”. 4） In terms of discipline system,the discipline system of NSIS has initially formed,consisting of three branches including military,public security and national security intelligence studies. 5） The research force presents a pattern of multidisciplinary participation, mainly coming from military science,public security science,library and information science,political science,history,public management science,law and other multidisciplinary fields. 6）The development trend of the discipline is moving towards “serving for national security and development” with five trend characteristics of “legalization,regression,integration,expansion and deepening”1 tab. 80 refs.
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
