| 宋丽萍,王建芳.开放科学环境下负责任评价实现路径研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2024,50(2):115~127 |
| 开放科学环境下负责任评价实现路径研究 |
| The Realization Path of Responsible Research Assessment in the Context of Open Science |
| 投稿时间：2022-07-11 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 提取和共现分析得出结论,即以研究质量和影响力为主维度,以知情同行评议为主基调,构成国际RRA改革的主要思路。在分析开放科学背景下我国学术交流新业态与RRA的基础上,提出我国RRA的三层结构框架。其中以识别科研新范式为情境,以改善宏观政策为支撑,以改革评价方式为实操,以评价主体多元化、评价内容多维化、评价对象精准化、评价方法循证化为路径,建立有利于潜心研究和创新的我国科研评价制度,并回答科研评价改革的必答题:“谁来评”“评什么”“如何评”“怎么用”。研究认为,建立质量意识、培育“影响素养”、达成评价系统变革的国际共识,从而提高RRA的互操作性和可移植性,避免相关理论与实践的碎片化是保证RRA顺利实施的关键 将负责任评价理念与实现路径本土化,营造有利于开放科学发展的学术交流环境,将成为我国图书情报工作的新使命。图2。参考文献43。关键词 开放科学 负责任评价 研究质量 社会影响力 |
| 英文关键词: Open science Responsible research assessment Research quality Social impact |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 47 |
| 全文下载次数: 42 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 开放科学的发展正在改变学术交流生态,同时对传统科研评价产生挑战,对于科研评价创新的呼声也日益高涨。负责任评价（RRA）应时而生并成为开放科学政策框架的重要组成部分,而如何实现RRA成为关键问题。本文解析开放科学环境下的RRA内涵,总结国内外相关理论与实践进展,在此基础上尝试探索RRA的实现路径,以期为“破四唯”指导下的我国科研评价提供借鉴与参考。以典型内容文本为数据源,通过 |
| 英文摘要: |
The development of open science is changing the ecology of scholarly communication as well as challenging the traditional research evaluation. Therefore,a call for innovation in research assessment is growing. Responsible Research Assessment （RRA） emerges and becomes an important part of the open science policy framework. However,how to realize RRA has become the key issue. Through analyzing the fundamentals of RRA in the context of open science,and summarizing the progress of local and international theories and practices in relevant fields,this paper aims to explore the realization path of RRA to shed light on China's research evaluation under the guidance of breaking the “Siwei”.
First of all,taking the typical relevant content texts as the data source,combined with the keyword extraction and co occurrence analysis,it shows that the approach of international RRA takes influence and research quality as the main dimension,and informed peer review as the main keynote as well.
Secondly,not only adhering the concept of RRA to top level design to embody the excellence and influence but also taking root in Chinese context and showing local characteristics,this paper puts forward the three layer structured framework of China's RRA process path after analyzing the new situation of scholarly communication in China. The identification of the new paradigm of scientific research is employed as the research context,the improvement of macro policies（scientific research funding,management and publication policies） is defined as the research support,and the reform of the evaluation method is used as the research practice. Meanwhile,the diversification of the evaluation subject,the multi dimensionality of the evaluation content,the precision of the evaluation object,and the evidence based basis of the evaluation method are considered to be the paths,and then China's evaluation system,which is conducive to dedicated research and innovation,is established so as to answer to the mandatory questions of the scientific research evaluation reform:“who to evaluate”,“what to evaluate”,“how to evaluate” and “how to use”.
This paper concludes that the reform and reconstruction of the research evaluation system is a gradual and continuous optimization process. Thus,establishing the quality awareness,cultivating “impact literacy”,and investigating an international consensus on the reform of the evaluation system,thereby improving the interoperability and portability of RRA in parallel to avoid the fragmentation of related theories and practices have become the key to future development. Furthermore,it points out that localizing the concept and realization path of RRA and creating scholarly communication conditions to foster open science may become a new mission of library and information service in China. 2 figs. 43 refs.
|
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
|
|
