| 李刚,孙建军.从边缘到中心：信息管理研究的学科范型嬗变[J].中国图书馆学报,2008,34(5): |
| From Margin to Center: On the Change of Disciplinary Paradigms in Information Management Study |
| 从边缘到中心：信息管理研究的学科范型嬗变 |
| |
| DOI： |
| Key words:Information management,Disciplinary paradigm,Inner way,Outer way |
| 中文关键词: 信息管理，学科范型，内在理路，外在理路 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Hits: 4472 |
| Download times: 3354 |
| Abstract: |
| Almost every discipline wants to go to the center of the knowledge map because of holding the center means possessing academic resources. There are two ways to go to the center. One can be called “inner way”; the other can be named “outer way”. The “inner way changing” is often promoted by the discipline community, while the “outer way changing” is usually driven by the social, economical and technological factors. The Information Management Study comes from the library management. As an art and not a science, the former library management profession made great efforts to set up the academic position of the Library Management. The Western library science simulates the social science such as sociology and economics. However, the Chinese library science borrows a lot ways from history science. But the most important changing in the IMS is led by the high technologies, such as Internet, multimedia and other IT, and by the social factors, such as globalization and market economy. Today, the traditional library science discipline paradigm is also changed into the IMS discipline paradigm.3 tabs.25 refs. |
| 中文摘要: |
| 学科范型的嬗变存在内在理路和外在理路两个路径。从内在理路看，欧美信息管理学科的发展走的是模拟“社会学”等实证社会学科的路径，中国走的是模拟“历史学”的路径。从外在理路看，经济全球化、社会信息化和信息技术的发展给信息管理领域学科范型的转变提供了极好的机遇。学科范型转变的内在理路与外在理路并不可以截然分开，外在理路往往需要通过内在理路起作用，学术共同体的数量与质量是决定内在理路能否顺利发展的关键。学科制度本身也是一个学术共同体再生产的机制，如果学术共同体觉得学科范型的转变危及自身的生存，不管是外在理路还是内在理路都会遇到学术共同体的阻断。目前，信息管理领域情报学的一支独秀，已经危及到图书馆学、档案学的生存，这些学科在情报学化的同时，也在酝酿新的发展方向，统一的信息管理学的诞生还有待时日。表3。参考文献25。 |
|
View Full Text
View/Add Comment Download reader |
