刘海霞,陈文洁,胡德华,雷雪.机构仓储可持续发展综合评价指标体系研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(2):67~77
The Comprehensive Evaluation Indicator System of the Sustainable Development of Institutional Repositories
机构仓储可持续发展综合评价指标体系研究
Received:June 24, 2013  Revised:September 08, 2013
DOI:
Key words:Institutional repositories  Synthetical evaluation  Indicator system  Analytic hierarchy process
中文关键词:  机构仓储  综合评价  指标体系  层次分析法
基金项目:本文系湖南省图书馆学会重点立项资助项目“数字资源服务绩效评估研究”(项目编号:XHZD1004)的研究成果之一。
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Liu Haixia 中南大学湘雅医学院医药信息系,湖南 长沙 410013  
Chen Wenjie 中南大学湘雅医学院医药信息系,湖南 长沙 410013  
Hu Dehua 中南大学湘雅医学院医药信息系,湖南 长沙 410013 hudehua2000@163.com 
Lei Xue 中南大学湘雅医学院医药信息系,湖南 长沙 410013  
Hits: 3032
Download times: 2796
Abstract:
This paper determines a basic framework of indicator system on the basis of the evaluation indicator system of dCollection project, a consortium of institutional repositories in South Korea, performs early tests on the indicator system by use of the expert grading method, and determines the best plan for weight distribution. On this basis, this paper quantifies and assigns all levels of indicators in the indicator system to construct a mathematical model of evaluation system.Evaluation indicators include management and policy, content, system and network, and user. Ten institutional repositories representing different subjects are chosen from Open DOAR and evaluated quantitatively and analyzed by the application of the evaluation model in the research. Finally we get the scores and further discuss the issues related to those ten institutional repositories. 1fig. 8tabs. 15refs.
中文摘要:
      本文在国内外机构仓储及数字图书馆评价研究成果的基础上,结合部分机构仓储的实际调查,以韩国机构仓储联盟dCollection 项目评价指标体系为基础确定指标体系的基本框架,使用专家评分法对指标体系进行前期测试,并确定权重分配的最佳方案。在此基础上对评价指标体系的各级指标进行量化和赋值,构建评价体系的数学模型。评价指标分为管理与政策、内容、系统与网络和用户指标四个维度。以 OpenDOAR 为主要信息源,根据一定的原则选出十个代表性的机构仓储,应用本研究的评价模型对其进行定量评价与分析,最终得到各研究对象的评分,找到存在的问题。图1。表8。参考文献15。
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader