Page 220 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2015 Vol. 41
P. 220

Extended English abstracts of articles published in the Chinese Edition of Journal of Library Science in China 2015 Vol.41  219


               different meaning with citation-based indicators, thus should be combined to use in evaluation.
               2) Altmetrics indicators reflect visibility, popularity and societal impact. Altmetrics cover more
               general scientific product users and reflect societal impact. 3) Altmetrics indicators based on data
               source from the academia reflect more academic impact. Academic impact should undoubtedly be
               limited to academic users, because users outside the academia cannot contribute citations. To sum
               up, the key to properly using altmetrics indicators is to distinguish the application context.
                 Criticism to the validity of altmetrics can be summarized into three aspects.1) altmetrics
               indicators bear the risk of being manipulated in large scale; 2) altmetrics data sources are not
               scientific and rigorous enough; 3) part of altmetrics data source cannot be traced. Despite the
               criticism, it must be made clear that these problems can be solved and avoided. 1) The risk of
               manipulating altmetrics indicators in large scale can be avoided; 2) every altmetrics indicator
               reflects users’ value judgment; 3) the establishment of altmetrics infrastructure makes the raw
               altmetrics data easy to store and reuse.



               The survival and development of UK public libraries under the global
               financial crisis
                                    ∗
               Lihong ZHOU, Ruhua HUANG1  & Tim ZIJLSTRA

               This paper discusses the survival and development of the public libraries in UK under the current
               global financial crisis, as well as the severe problems of public funding cuts, public library
               closures, staff loss and significant decrease in service quality. Specifically, this paper discusses the
               emergence, development and current situation of UK library crisis from three main perspectives,
               namely, the UK government, the library community, and the general public. This paper aims to
               articulate and provide useful indications and suggestions for the development of public libraries in
               China.
                 This paper adopts an inductive interpretive philosophical lens and is developed based on
               systematic retrieval, critical review and analysis of the existing literature. The analysis was
               performed in four theoretical perspectives: the outburst of the global financial crisis, societal
               changes under the impact of the economic recession, political response and change, as well as the
               influences on UK public library and library service.
                 In order to obtain both holistic and in-depth understandings, the literature review includes
               academic articles, statistics and official reports published by the UK government, public reports
               and announcement published by various professional associations (such as the Chartered Institute
               of Library and Information Professionals), and relevant news articles and comments on major
               newspapers and web portals in UK. All articles selected had been published since 2008 and were


               * Correspondence should be addressed to Ruhua HUANG, Email: rhhuang@whu.edu.cn
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225