Page 238 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2015 Vol. 41
P. 238

Extended English abstracts of articles published in the Chinese Edition of Journal of Library Science in China 2015 Vol.41  237


               academic information seeking behavior in the context of microblogs so as to obtain longitudinal
               research data, which would complement the results presented here.




               Characteristics and inspirations of academic blog communication
                        1 ∗
               Jingda DING   & Xin XU

               Academic blogs have become a rapid mode for scholarly communication. However, compared
               with the traditional academic journal, blog has not been well recognized or understood. Therefore,
               research of the characteristics of academic blog communication is helpful to effectively implement
               quality control and management of academic blogs.
                 Using the world’s largest Chinese science community, blog.sciencenet.cn as the study sample,
               the whole dataset from that community is collected in 2013, including 5 425 blogs, 64 880 blog
               posts, 278 640 comments from 14 823 users, 389 783 recommendations from 9 020 users, and
               38 856 010 visits. On the basis of descriptive statistics and K-S tests of each kind of sample
               data, using SPSS software, the methods of Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman are chosen to test the
               differences and analyze the correlations. Other methods are also applied, such as comparison with
               traditional document communication, induction, inference and so on.
                 The following conclusions are obtained: First, the blogger’s academic status (or rank, such as
               Associate Professor, Full Professor) has a significant impact on academic blog communication. The
               higher the academic status of the bloggers, the more posts they make, and the greater the number
               of communication exchanges with the blog (comments, references, and visits). The test also shows
               significant impact differences between different academic statuses. Hence, it suggests that author
               authority, such as professional title, could be used to judge and filter the mass academic blogs.
               Second, academic blog communication presents significant discipline differences, which inspires
               the design of some relevant indexes to measure and compare the influence of blogs of different
               disciplines. One example is the blog comment indicator (BCI). Third, different types of academic
               blog communication are correlated and conform to the power-law distribution, which indicates
               that the academic blog community shows the phenomenon of“small world”and core bloggers
               exist within it. Fourth, the academic blog displays interdisciplinary communication, exhibiting
               wide cross-disciplinary exchange and diffusion. Consequently, the blog diffusion indexes (BDIs)
               are proposed, which measure the extent of interdisciplinary academic blog communication. Fifth,
               the academic blog community is also contextual (such as instant discussion, videos, pictures,
               etc.) and collaborative in contrast with formal scholarly literature communication, which fosters
               an environment of knowledge innovation. Finally, formal scholarly literature communication can
               also supply and motivate the academic blog communication. For example, formal publications

               * Correspondence should be addressed to Jingda DING, Email: djdhyn@126.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-4075-8604
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243