Page 147 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 42
P. 147

146 Journal of Library Science in China, Vol. 8, 2016


            we can extract method terms from academic papers. This information can be used as a key data
            source for constructing the method knowledge base. The method knowledge base can be embedded
            into decision support decision system or expert intelligence system and act as a support for method
            selection. We can also use the method knowledge base to draw method pedigree chart or field
            method development map. These results will promote the normalization of the usage of methods.
            In a word, the extraction and mining of method knowledge elements have both research and
            application value.
              Knowledge mining can be categorized into two approaches, i.e. the statistical-based and the
            rule-based. Statistical-based approaches are more suitable in text-mining fields that the unit of
            processing is the word. However, in the fields that the unit of processing is the sentence, due to the
            complexity of sentences, it is difficult for statistical-based approaches to adapt to such a situation
            and thus researchers prefer rule-based and pattern recognition approaches. The description of
            method knowledge elements in academic papers is sentence-based. It is more appropriate that we
            choose rule-based and pattern recognition approaches. The types of the method knowledge element
            and the way to construct method knowledge element description rules are the key in the extraction
            of method knowledge element from papers.


            1  Literature review


            Current studies on knowledge elements and rule extraction focus on several aspects, e.g. theories
            and reviews, knowledge element representation and modeling, knowledge element and rule
            extraction and implementation, etc.
              (1) Knowledge element theories and reviews
              Wen Youkui et al. (2011) believed that the knowledge element semantic linking theory would
            be important in the next-generation knowledge discovery pattern. He explained extensively on the
            basic concepts, methods and technology of discovery of latent linking between knowledge elements
            in literature from a semantic linking theory perspective. Gao Jiping et al. (2015) presented a review
            of the definition, measures, research projects and applications of knowledge elements on various
            fields. Jiang Yongchang (2011) considered knowledge elements as the basic element of knowledge
            organization and constructed a knowledge organization neural system based on knowledge
            element linkage. Wen Tingxiao et al. (2007) analyzed the value and difficulties in the Chinese text
            knowledge element construction. They pointed out that the Chinese word segmentation would be
            the bottleneck in the area. Word segmentation is an elementary process in Chinese text information
            processing. However, it is not the key difficulty in knowledge element extraction. In the English
            knowledge element extraction, the same problems remain. In determining knowledge elements,
            we need to combine several words to form a knowledge element concept. For example, knowledge
            management is a knowledge element unit while only or management alone cannot represent any
            meaningful knowledge element.
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152