Page 166 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 43
P. 166

166
            166   Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.9, 2017


            includes not only the academic achievements of the thesis, but also the research results in non-
            paper form. 2)We found that the development of open source software innovation has promoted
            the creativity in the academic field by research on the impact evaluation of open source software
            based on Altmetrics. 3)There is a big gap between the software in the Python community, and
            most of the academic influence on the software is still low. The limitation of this paper lies
            in the fact that the standard of “academic” software needs to be further refined. We think that
            the accuracy of the method of matching the keywords, such as the name and introduction of
            the software library, needs to be further improved. Besides, we need to strengthen the impact
            of academic software in-depth study in order to draw more comprehensive and scientific
            conclusions.




            A review on information source selection and an integrated conceptual model
                     〇a*
            WANG Fang〇, ZHANG Xin & ZHAI Yujia
            As one of the most important research topics in information seeking field, information source
            selection has received much attention from scientific community since the 1960’s. With the rapid
            growth of information technique, the increasing information sources are posing a new challenge
            for people to get information. Meanwhile, scientists have made many achievements in information
            source selection behavior for different kinds of people in the context of various information needs,
            tasks and situations. In order to provide a deeper understanding of information source selection,
            this paper summarizes the results of related studies and discusses potential extensions for future
            research.
              The literature search and review is based on the following databases: WileyInter Science,
            Elsevier Science Direct, Emerald Insight, Pro Quest Digital Dissertations & Theses, EBSCO
            Academic Search Premier, Springer LINK, The ACM Digital Library, Taylor & Francis, IEEE/
            IET Electronic Library and China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database. The search
            queries are “Information source selection” “information source choice” “information source
            preference” and “information source adoption”. The retrieval deadline is March 3rd, 2016. Finally,
            we identified 299 English articles and 46 Chinese articles.
              This paper consists of four parts: an overview of related research, a review of theoretical
            factors, the model construction based on theories, and the discussion of future research. The
            first part is a general overview, which finds most studies of information source selection are in
            Information Science and Medical Science, while a small amount is distributed in management,
            education, communication, sociology, psychology and other fields;the main theoretical basis
            includes value comparison (such as Principles of Least Effort, Cost-Benefit Theory, Expectancy-


            * Correspondence should be addressed to Wang Fang, Email: wangfangnk@nankai.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-2655-9975
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171