Page 66 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 44
P. 66

ZHAO Yuxiang / A preliminary exploration on citizen science projects based on scientific crowdsourcing perspectives:   065
                                                          Conceptualization, pattern design and research opportunities


               crowdsourcing activities. Secondly, from the angle of organization and society, realistic demands
               and feasible tasks drive the development of scientific crowdsourcing. And a growing number of
               scientific research projects require mass participation at multiple levels, and properly decomposed
               and designed tasks can also better reduce users’ engagement barriers and entry barriers. Finally,
               in terms of technology, the innovation of mobile Internet and the popularization of intelligent
               terminals have accelerated the development of scientific crowdsourcing.The public can record,
               capture, create and share data and information of different granularity and categories with various
               ICT devices whenever and wherever possible, and communicate and collaborate with the help of
               social media (see Figure 1).



                         5JNF TVSQMVT                                   /FFET   3FRVJSFNFOUT



                                    1VTIJOH GPSDF  4DJFOUJGJD              0SHBOJ[BUJPOT
                         7PMVOUFFST
                                                 DSPXETPVSDJOH                4PDJFUZ


                       $PHOJUJWF TVSQMVT                GPSDF  "DDFMFSBUJOH  1SBDUJDBM UBTL



                                                   5FDIOPMPHZ
                       .PCJMF *OUFSOFU                                      *OUFMMJHFOU
                         JOOPWBUJPO                                     UFSNJOBM QPQVMBSJ[BUJPO

                                    Figure 1. Core driving force of scientific crowdsourcing.


               2.2  Features and categories of scientific crowdsourcing

               The traditional crowdsourcing model is mainly embodied in two types, namely, crowdsourcing
               competition and wiki collaboration (Zhao & Zhu, 2014a). The former emphasizes the optimization
               of the scheme and is mainly driven by external motivation and stimulation while the latter focuses
               on the convergence of results and is mainly generated by internal motivation and stimulation. These
               two modes, however, have great theoretical and practical gaps in the decomposition, coordination,
               cooperation and collaboration of crowdsourcing participants. Firstly, scientific crowdsourcing
               tasks exceed a great many commercial crowdsourcing tasks in the light of complexity, granularity,
               and attribute structure. Tasks that are not properly designed and disassembled are often difficult to
               understand and accept by the general public, thus affecting the execution and completion of tasks.
               Secondly, as scientific crowdsourcing involves different participants and organizations, it often
               takes more time and energy to communicate and coordinate multiple interests and needs. From the
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71