Page 69 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 44
P. 69

068   Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.10, 2018



            expensive to participate in or too small for the range of the target audience. In the meanwhile,
            although a lot of research topics in the social sciences emphasize doing a certain scale of
            researches through sample selection and sampling analysis, these researches usually take research
            object or research target audience as the research object rather than the active subject of research
            implementation, which also largely excludes the traditional survey or interview based social
            science research project from the citizen science project. I believe that citizen science should
            advocate the idea of “What comes from the people should absolutely benefit the people” in the
            early stage of project positioning. Otherwise, it is impossible to succeed in breaking out of the
            framework of traditional scientific community and achieve real open innovation. This is why
            most projects on Innocentive crowdsourcing platform cannot be defined technically as science
            projects. Scientific crowdsourcing therefore is not synonymous with citizen science. Scientific
            crowdsourcing should be seen as an idea and paradigm for solving problems, while citizen science
            emphasizes more on the publicity and social mission of the project. For example, Tao Zexuan’s
            “The No. eight problem of savant” adopts the form of scientific crowdsourcing, but it cannot be
            considered to be citizen science in that the public’s acceptance and understanding of such tasks
            are far from enough and the need for feedback quantity and sample diversity is also low. And it’s
            also worth noting that citizen science projects are generally aimed at the general public rather
            than scientific researchers with specialized theoretical or domain knowledge. Therefore, the
            divide between volunteers and scientists in citizen science projects should be relatively clear, and
            volunteers’ contributions tend to be good-quality contents evolving or emerging from quantitative
            accumulations. In consequence, although citizen science project is rooted in the idea of scientific
            crowdsourcing, it can only be regarded as a specific form of scientific crowdsourcing, rather than
            a strict equivalence to crowdsourcing. Cooper et al. (2007) believe that from the perspective of
            terminology and standardization, the words “citizen science” should be clearly marked in research
            papers and reports once volunteers participate. By doing so, the efficacy of citizen science will be
            visualized, and it will be much helpful for subsequent researchers to summarize and tease out the
            achievements in this field.


            3.1  Business model of citizen science projects from the perspective of scientific
            crowdsourcing


            Over the past decade, citizen science projects abroad have received great attention and sustained
            input from the scientific communities, non-profit organizations, innovation incubators and
            government departments. China has also started to attach growing importance to and develop this
            field in recent years. The author summarized the types and characteristics of citizen science projects
            in the previous research, pointing out that citizen science projects involve particularly different
            businesses, such as data collection, pattern recognition, sample evaluation, scheme selection, data
            analysis and research design, etc. in accordance with the distinction of scientists or objectives of
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74