Page 78 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.45, 2019
P. 78

LI Guihua & LIU Jing / Transition: Adolescents’ hybrid reading in the omnimedia era  077


               dimension, but also the compound dimensions, especially in the context of Internet. Research on
               this new scenario’s influence on social roles and behaviors is a key issue in current social science
               research (Yu & Ma, 2016). Therefore, hybrid learning, hybrid consumption and other related
               phenomena have been closely concerned by relevant academic and practical fields (Garrison &
               Kanuka, 2004; Heinrichs, Schreiber, & Schoning, 2011).
                 In fact, the changes brought by the Internet technology in the media environment is
               transforming people’s reading behavior. The omnimedia is “a cross-media product of media
               convergence” (G.N. Liu, 2010). In the omnimedia era, all kinds of scenarios have been connected,
               which leads to space-time overlap. Reading carrier, reading channels and even people’s reading
               situation are fully extended in the compound dimensions, thus the hybrid reading behavior
               flourished. The reading behavior under this compound dimensions is referred as hybrid reading in
               this study.
                 The concept of “hybrid reading” was put forward by Yuan Yuming (2014) as the philosophy
               of new library science, and he advocated from the theory of intersubjectivity that libraries
               should meet the needs of people’s all-round development through the social communication and
               comprehensive reading of aesthetic and moral evaluation, in addition to the dissemination of
               knowledge. Considering that library’s status as a knowledge dissemination institution is being
               greatly challenged, this view has its reality. Compared with the “hybrid reading” of macro-concept
               category, this paper focuses on the “composite” characteristics of current readers’ reading behavior
               in terms of both online and offline, knowledge value and other values, so that the hybrid reading
               behavior is defined as: “a social behavior that individuals obtain the compound value of knowledge
               aesthetics, moral concept, etc. from written language and other written symbols through choosing,
               reading, evaluation, sharing and other activities”. This definition emphasizes the three “composite”
               features of hybrid reading behavior. The first one is media composite, which means that the reader
               will choose a variety of channels offline and online for reading activities, while taking into account
               both paper and electronic reading carrier forms. The second one is behavior composite, that is, the
               reader’s reading behavior with “reading” as the focus changes into a hybrid process that includes
               choice, decision-making, acquisition, reading and sharing, and each stage may develop into a
               complex process of behavior focus. And the third one is the value composite, which indicates that
               through the experience of a variety of media and reading behavior the readers will deeply feel that,
               in addition to knowledge value and functional value, reading also demonstrates distinctively the
               exchange value and entertainment value. In this way, the readers will also regard these values as
               their own pursuit in reading.
                 The rise of various virtual reading communities and reading tools suggests that the reading
               behavior of the composite dimension is shaping, and a transition from traditional reading to hybrid
               reading is under way, however, this hint still requires data confirmation. Contemporary young
               adults born in the omnimedia environment or experienced the transition period of the omnimedia
               environment, who are the “indigenous people” of the new environment (Ulla & Annelis, 2006).
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83