Page 258 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.47, 2021
P. 258

257
                           Extended English abstracts of articles published in the Chinese edition of Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.47, 2021  257


               during the anti-epidemic exhibits to cooperate in constructing collective memory:1) curators are
               the organizer of memory construction, mainly responsible for information collection, information
               organization and information dissemination; 2) donors are the original owners of anti-epidemic
               memories, and their information behaviors are mainly to cooperate with curators’ information
               collection and information sharing process; 3) visitors are information receivers, and their main
               information behavior is to receive information and disseminate it to the outside world.
                 Finally, based on the activity theory, this paper further explores the key elements and processes
               of information practices in the construction of anti-epidemic collective memory in the GLAM
               context. Four subsystems based on different activity structures are identified, including internal
               collaboration system, narrative communication system, external division of labor system and
               double framing system, and analyzes the information practices produced by each subsystem in
               shaping collective memory.
                 Last but not least, we summarize our findings and provide theoretical contributions and practical
               implications for future research on collective memory in the context of public health emergencies
               and GLAM’s information practice to construct collective memory.



               Theoretical research on Bibliodiversity

                             〇a*
               LI Haibo, KU Liping  & NIE Hua
               In the context of the in-depth development of the open access movement, the issue of
               Bibliodiversity, which aims to realize the ideals of “equal access to knowledge” and “knowledge
               sharing”, and to promote the development of local research has gradually attracted attention. This
               research adopts the foresight thought method, combing the current theoretical research content
               of Bibliodiversity on the basis of known theories and practices. From the perspective of library
               practice, it is divided into eight dimensions to explore Bibliodiversity and library practice.
                 This study believes that libraries should pay attention to and actively participate in the
               construction and cultivation of Bibliodiversity, focusing on eight major issues. Libraries are
               committed to participate in the design of an open scholarly communication system that not only
               promotes Bibliodiversity, but also supports international level research.
                 1) The participation of stakeholders. Bibliodiversity requires extensive opinions and joint
               construction of stakeholders. Stakeholders can include: researchers, policy makers, funders, service
               providers, universities/research institutions, libraries, etc.
                 2) The multiple forms, channels and functions of academic information exchange. Bibliodiversity
               requires multiple forms of academic information exchange. Promoting Bibliodiversity means
               providing broader communication channels and methods and promoting the diversity of scholarly



               *Correspondence should be addressed to KU Liping, Email:gulp@mail.las.as.cn, ORCID:0000-0002-2284-3856.
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263