| 叶继元.学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊异同之思考——以史学学术期刊评价为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2008,34(4): |
| 学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊异同之思考——以史学学术期刊评价为例 |
| A Comparative Study of Evaluation of Periodicals by Scholars and by Citation Indexes |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术期刊评价，学者评价，引文评价，史学期刊评价 |
| 英文关键词: Evaluation of academic periodicals, Evaluation by scholars, Evaluation by citation indexes, Evaluation of periodicals in history |
| 基金项目:本文为国家社会科学基金重大项目“建立与完善哲学社会科学评价体系”（项目批准号：04&ZD031）的子课题《中国人文社科学术期刊合理布局研究》之研究成果。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4097 |
| 全文下载次数: 3278 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 学者评价期刊与引文评价期刊，各有其优点和局限性，二者有不同和相同之处。将近期史学学者评价史学期刊的结果与CSSCI引文评价的结果对比，二者除具有一定的正相关性外，还具有不同的评价方法和结果，引文评价结果可供学者评价参考。表3。参考文献2。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Both evaluation of periodicals by scholars and evaluation of periodicals by citation indexes have their own advantages and limitations. The author compares recent evaluations of periodicals in history by history scholars and by CSSCI citation indexes, and finds that they have certain correlation elements and different evaluation methodologies and results. The evaluation by citation indexes can be used by scholars as a reference tool. 3 tabs. 2 refs. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
