| 陈传夫,王云娣.中美图书馆学借用知识的比较观察——基于十年引文的分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(6):0 |
| 中美图书馆学借用知识的比较观察——基于十年引文的分析 |
| A Comparative Observation of Borrowing Knowledge in Library Science between China and USA：An Analysis Based on Ten-year-citations |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 图书馆学，借用知识，中国，美国，引文分析 |
| 英文关键词: Library science,Borrowing knowledge,China,USA,Citation analysis |
| 基金项目:湖北省省级教学研究项目“iSchool教学理念与我国图书情报人才培养模式改革探索”（编号：2009025）研究成果之一。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4824 |
| 全文下载次数: 3264 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 对中美4种图书馆学拔尖期刊3116篇论文的36998篇样本引文进行了多角度分析，发现中美图书馆学理论均广泛借用其他学科知识，借用学科出现长尾现象。从借用学科领域看，美国较关注生命系统领域，中国关注非生命系统领域；从借用知识形式看，中国重视动态知识，美国则更重视稳定知识；从借用知识年代看，美国重视累计的知识，中国更重视现实知识。据此得出结论：中国图书馆学知识体系更接近于应用学科，美国图书馆学知识体系更接近于生命系统学科；中国图书馆学研究重视吸收新知识，忽略知识积累。我国图书馆学研究应加强基础理论研究，加强对纯科学知识的借用,加强生命系统学科知识的借用，注重知识积累与学术传承。图1。表6。参考文献14。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| With the analysis of 36，998 citations and references in 3,116 articles published in four top library science journals in both China and USA, we found that library science widely borrows knowledge from other disciplines in both US and China. In borrowing literatures from other disciplines, library science of the United States pay fairly attention to life system domain, but China library science concentrates on non life system domain. From the perspective of citation currency, China library science tends to borrow the newly published literature from journals, and the United States puts more emphasis on monographs and the cumulative knowledge. We draw the conclusion that China library science knowledge has characteristics of applied discipline, and the library science knowledge in the USA has characteristics of life system discipline. Library science researchers in China should pay more attention to the knowledge accumulation, and the knowledge of life's elements. The paper puts forward the proposals to improve the library sciences ecology in China，and promote research on basic theory and so on.1 fig. 6 tabs. 14 refs. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
