Page 133 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 42
P. 133

132 Journal of Library Science in China, Vol. 8, 2016


            number of the relevant documents. The precision and recall of the two-round retrieval experiments
            for the library OPAC system are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 respectively.






                                                                                       3
                                                                                       3



                                              ᛫
                   ѹ η η ሙ ሙ ஔ η ৱ ॷ ॷ ఻ ॎ ៶ ᛫ ஝    ኮ х ҷ ڎ ᇫ ࠫ ܱ η ஝ ᝠ ေ ሙ ඟ ҷ ၷ
                   ழ ৌ ৌ ߦ ੿ ߦ ৌ ਖ ေ ေ ٨ र Ἧ ໦ ૶    ေ ኖ ү ࠒ ͘ ܱ ̔ ৌ ૶ ካ ᝷ ߦ ீ ү ေ
                   ኮ ೝ ߦ ᆑ ੇ ေ ੿       Ϥ ೝ ᤿ ॷ    ܫ  ߦ ߦ ҧ ᛡ ˟ ஋ Т ܫ ኮ வ ҧ ᜻ ߦ Ӽ ߦ
                   ေ ጊ    ቃ ౧ ᝷ ష      क ጊ ᣤ  ေ   ေ       ஋ ˧ ኖ ጇ ေ ေ ข ߦ ѳ     ၷ
                                              ߦ           ఻ ᭩
                                              ἰ           Т ֑
            Note:R1 is the recall without the use of the terminology service, R2 is the recall with the use of the terminology service.
                 ฌ὘3 ˞ళΎၹషឦ఩ҬᄊಊЛဋὊ3 ˞Ύၹషឦ఩ҬᄊಊЛဋ
             Figure 5. The recalls of the library OPAC system with or without the use of the “GetSynonym” terminology service.







                                                                                      1
                                                                                      1



                                              ᛫
                    ѹ η η ሙ ሙ ஔ η ৱ ॷ ॷ ఻ ॎ ៶ ᛫ ஝  ኮ х ҷ ڎ ᇫ ࠫ ܱ η ஝ ᝠ ေ  ሙ ඟ ҷ ၷ
                    ழ ৌ ৌ ߦ ੿ ߦ ৌ ਖ ေ ေ ٨ र Ἧ ໦ ૶  ေ ኖ ү ࠒ ͘ ܱ ̔ ৌ ૶ ካ ᝷  ߦ ீ ү ေ
                    ኮ ೝ ߦ ᆑ ੇ ေ ੿      Ϥ ೝ ᤿ ॷ   ܫ  ߦ ߦ ҧ ᛡ ˟ ஋ Т ܫ ኮ வ ҧ  ᜻ ߦ Ӽ ߦ
                    ေ ጊ   ቃ ౧ ᝷ ష      क ጊ ᣤ  ေ  ေ       ஋ ˧  ኖ ጇ ေ ေ ข ߦ  ѳ  ၷ
                                              ߦ          ఻ ᭩
                                              ἰ          Т ֑
            Note: P1 is the precision without the use of the terminology service, P2 is the precision with the use of the terminology service.
                 ฌ὘1 ˞ళΎၹషឦ఩ҬᄊಊюဋὊ1 ˞Ύၹషឦ఩Ҭᄊಊюဋ
             Figure 6. The precisions of the library OPAC system with or without the use of the “Getsynonym” terminology service.


              As shown in Figure 5, the recall of all the experiments increases after calling the terminology
            service. The average recall of the first-round experiments is 50.3%, whereas the average recall
            of the second-round is 77% with an increase of 26.7%. This means that expanding query terms
            through the “GetSynonyms” terminology service can significantly improve the completeness
            of retrieval results. As shown in Figure 6, the average precision of the first-round experiments
            is 64.4%, whereas the average precision of the second-round is 59.8% with a decrease of 4.6%.
            In comparison to the consistent improvement of all the experiments’ recall values, the precision
            values vary differently. The precision of only a third of the experiments increases after calling the
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138