Page 206 - JOURNAL OF LIBRARY SCIENCE IN CHINA 2018 Vol. 42
P. 206

Extended English abstracts of articles published in the Chinese edition of Journal of Library Science in China 2016 Vol.42  205


               contra-productive to professional public library services,and therefore form a new bottleneck to
               the development of a universal public library service for all. It suggests that facilities in township
               comprehensive cultural stations be restructured and renamed to enable township public library
               service to take shape.



               Martin Schrettinger’s thoughts on and contributions to Library Science

               XU Yuequan ,XU Zhaoying & LIU Chunli
                       ①a *
               The objectives of this study are to summarize the main contents of Schrettinger’s doctrine,to reveal
               Martin Schrettinger’s methodology of the discipline construction,and to establish his historical
               position as the founder of modern Library Science. We argue in this paper that Schrettinger
               constructed the “Library Science” as a new discipline with clear theoretical self-consciousness,and
               his doctrine has the salient feature of unifying humanities,science,and technology.
                 Schrettinger was clearly aware that the major contemporary issues he faced were how to build
               good large-scale libraries. His purpose of writing the books was to make Library Science as a new
               independent discipline,and only people who had received specialized training in Library Science
               were capable of the task of building large-scale libraries. He was the first to propose the idea of
               founding Library Science education based on large-scale libraries in 1814.
                 Schrettinger consciously implemented the humanistic spirit of the European Enlightenment into
               the propositions of Library Science,particularly into the three core concepts:“library”,“Library
               Science” and “the supreme principle of Library Science”. According to Schrettinger’s
               definitions,a library is a large entity of books,whose purpose is to rapidly satisfy all literature
               needs. Hence,Library Science is all the precepts necessary to the practical organization of
               a library,provided that they are based on sound principles and reducible to one supreme
               principle. Since literature needs expressed to a library can only be satisfied through the library
               collections,each library facility should be designed to serve the purpose of locating as quickly as
               possible the book desired;this certainly should be the supreme principle of Library Science.
                 Following the ideal paradigm of natural sciences,Schrettinger consciously built Library
               Science by attempting to derive all the propositions of the discipline logically from the supreme
               principle of Library Science. Of particular interest is that he formulated the principle from the
               angle of the literature needs of people,and not from the physical perspective of things. In order
               to expand the content of each part of Library Science,he also carefully built up a conceptual
               framework that consisted of six basic concepts: Libraries,Library Science,the purpose of library
               facilities,the supreme principles of Library Science,the needs that library collections should meet
               and the general measures to safeguard satisfaction. It is from the internal logical relationships


               * Correspondence should be addressed to XU Yuequan,Email:xu1918@aliyun.com,ORCID:0000-0001-8289-7744
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211