Page 160 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.45, 2019

159
Extended English abstracts of articles published in the Chinese edition of Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.45, 2019 159

The results show that the hotspots of research on three themes are mainly located in North
America, Europe and Asia. Although there are scientific research collaborations between different
regions, research collaboration with regional cities is still the main mode; Europe and North
America occupy a dominant position in the dissemination of knowledge on various topics, play
the role of the initiator of knowledge flow and have a strong driving role in the development
of scientific research in other regions; the core-periphery analysis divides the urban nodes
participating in scientific research collaboration into four classes: core dominant node, core
participating node, periphery dominant node and periphery participating node; the geographical
distance between nodes has weak negative correlation with the intensity of scientific research
collaboration between nodes; the more disparate the node scientific research strength, the greater
the probability of scientific research collaboration; the connection of weak scientific research
strength nodes has no significant impact on the formation of scientific research collaboration
network. The connection between different scientific research strength nodes has strong
randomness, but the overall trend is that the connection between the strong node and the weak
node has more beneficial effect on the formation and expansion of scientific research cooperation
network. The dynamic analysis of the research collaboration networks has revealed the distinctive
research directions and fronts of three themes.
Although the above-mentioned topics have relatively complete academic representations, the
judgments on cross-regional scientific research collaboration may require more tests. Cross-
regional research collaboration networks have shown some sparseness, and the application effects
of some community discovery algorithm need to be improved.

A review on the data reuse behavior of scholars: System review and meta
synthesis

SUN Yuwei, CHENG Ying & XIE Juan
〇a ∗
There is an academic consensus on the value of scientific data reuse, but the practice is not
satisfactory. Through combing the main research problems of scholars’ data reuse, the paper
attempts to clarify the situation of the research and to find out the gaps in the current research,
then to present the future research directions. System reviews and literature meta-synthesis method
were used in this study, which strictly controls the inclusion of sample articles. Then, a critical
evaluation of the included articles was performed using EBL Critical Assessment Checklist. 39
articles that score more than 75% are included. Subsequently, bibliometrics characteristics and
characteristics of the content were extracted. Finally, a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) method
was used to synthesize the concepts of these topics on relevance criteria and perceived reusability

* Correspondence should be addressed to CHENG Ying, Email: chengy@nju.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-0664-7206