Page 163 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.45, 2019
P. 163

162
            162   Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.11, 2019


            the methods by establishing a mechanism to evaluate the undertakers in accordance with the
            contract, preventing the administrative management of governments, and controlling the excessive
            profit-seeking tendency of cultural enterprises or social organizations.




            The reflection on the enforcement of public culture law in China: Centered on
            the Security Legislation of Public Cultural Service and the Public Library Law

                  〇a ∗
            LIN Hua  & CHU Tianshu
            The implementation of public cultural law is an important part of promoting rule of law in the field
            of culture and promoting the development and prosperity of public culture. In order to reveal the
            current situation and problems of the implementation of the public cultural law in China and to
            promote the future improvement of the implementation of the public cultural law, this paper makes
            a preliminary study and reflection on the implementation of the public cultural law in China by
            using text analysis, empirical research analysis, historical analysis and other methods. The study
            reveals that in the legal system of public culture including the law on the Security Legislation of
            Public Cultural Service and the Public Library Law, the subjects of legal obligations are divided
            into agencies, public cultural facilities management units (including public libraries, museums,
            etc.), and other organizations and individuals. Different legal entities have different legal
            obligations. Other organizations and individuals bear negative obligations. Public cultural facilities
            management units are responsible for specific payment obligations, while agencies are responsible
            for abstract payment obligations.
              The traditional cultural law implementation approach (the cultural law enforcement model) is
            based on the deterrence theory and applies to the private subjects in the field of cultural market.
            From the perspective of its generation and structure, this model has strong normativeness,
            pertinence and limitations. The implementation of cultural market law with legal autonomy as the
            basic concept cannot fully match the characteristics of public culture law, so it needs to reflect
            the implementation of public culture law. The agencies and public cultural facilities management
            units in the public cultural legal system are all public power departments that undertake public
            services and have public functions. The traditional cultural law enforcement mode for private
            subjects cannot be applied or not applicable. Other organizations and individuals in public
            cultural legal systems cannot directly apply cultural enforcement models for cultural market.
            Therefore, on the one hand, agencies and public cultural facilities management units in the
            field of public cultural law still lack effective legal enforcement mechanisms, and there is no
            effective means of governance for their illegal activities; on the other hand, the illegal behavior
            of other organizations and individuals in the field of public cultural law can not be applied to


            * Correspondence should be addressed to LIN Hua, Email: linhua0604@163.com, ORCID: 0000-0001-6269-5969
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168