Page 49 - Journal of Library Science in China 2020 Vol.46

048 Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.12, 2020

References

Breeding, M. (2007). It’s time to break the mold of the original ILS. Computers in Libraries, 27(10), 39-41.
Breeding, M. (2012). New library collections, new technologies, new workflows. Computers in Libraries,
32(5), 23-25.
Breeding, M. (2015). Library services platforms: A maturing genre of products. Chicago: American Library
Association.
Bugg, K. L., & Odom, R. Y. (2009). Extreme makeover reference edition: Restructuring reference services at
the Robert W. Woodruff Library, Atlanta University Center. The Reference Librarian, 50(2), 193-204.
Editoral Office of New Technology of Library and Information Service (2013). Capita launches next-
generation library management system（Capita推出下一代图书馆管理系统）. New Technology of
Library and Information Service（现代图书情报技术）, (6), 84.
CHU, J. L., & ZHAO, Y. (2019). Library capacity transformation from resource: Based to service-based
model(图书馆从资源能力到服务能力的转型变革). Library and Information Service(图书情报工作),
63(1), 11-17.
England, L. A., & Miller, S. D. (2016). Maximizing electronic resources management in libraries. Oxford:
Chandos Publishing.
FAN, J. H. (2014). Study on the role of libraries in scientific data management（图书馆在科学数据管理中
的角色定位研究）. Library and Information Service（图书情报工作）, 58(6), 37-41.
FU, P. (2017). The impact of the next-generation ILS on American library consortium（新一代图书馆管理
集成系统对美国图书馆联盟的影响分析）. Digital Library Forum（数字图书馆论坛）, (2), 28-33.
GOU, D., & TONG, Y. (2016). Study on construction model of library consortia in China and United States
（中美图书馆联盟建设模式研究）. Information Research（情报探索）, (10), 12-16.
Hammer, M. (1990). Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 104-
112.
Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. (2009). The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery. Proceedings
of the IEEE, 99(8), 1334-1337.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2019). Development and access to
information 2019. Retrieved August 26, 2019, from https://da2i.ifla.org/da2i-report-2019.
JIA, X. L., LI, S. N., & WU, Y. M. (2016). Next generation library service platform based on the “ Internet +
library ” thinking（“互联网+图书馆”思维下的下一代图书馆服务平台）. Library & Information（图
书与情报）, (1), 44-48.
JIN, X. P., XU, F., & BI, X. (2017). On the library paradigm evolution and business process reorganization in
the era of Internet plus（“互联网+”时代图书馆范式演变与业务流程重组）. Library Science Research
& Work（图书馆研究与工作）, (5), 5-11.
LI, J., ZHANG, X. L., & YANG, F. (2017). Empirical analysis on the choice strategy of next generation
library services platforms: Take ALAM, Kuali OLE, OCLC WorldShare and Sierra for example（基于实
证分析的下一代图书馆服务平台选择策略——以ALAM、KualiOLE、OCLC WorldShare和Sierra为
例）. Library & Information（图书与情报）, (3), 84-92.
LI, Z. C. (2018). Study on the current situation and development strategy of domestic scientific data sharing
platform（国内科学数据共享平台建设现状及发展策略研究）. Library Theory and Practice（图书馆
理论与实践）, (8), 108-112.
LIU, Z. H., & ZENG, L. Y. (2017). Investigation and comparative analysis of scientific research data
management and sharing platform of universities in China（我国高校科研数据管理与共享平台调研与
比较分析）. Information and Documentation Services（情报资料工作）, (6), 90-95.
MIAO, Q. (1996). Automation, digitalization and the beyond: Re-engineering Shanghai Library. In