Page 153 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.47, 2021

152 Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.13, 2021

infrastructure for digital humanities, and make use of their professional knowledge of information
organization, retrieval, analysis, and so on to provide methodological guidance. Professionalism
is also the bridge connecting disciplines and technologies. Technicality is an essential element.
Information technology, natural language processing technology, semantic web technology, text
mining technology and the like are used in humanities data analysis to boost academic innovation
and knowledge innovation in the humanities field. Therefore, the digital humanities research
in China needs to aim at the goal of constructing “ new liberal arts”, break through current
situation in which the library, information and archives field plays the principle role, strengthen
interdisciplinary communication and cooperation, and attract the attention of scholars in humanities
and other fields on a larger scale, in order to further promote the integration of humanities and
social sciences and new technologies. It also needs to cultivate a good digital humanities ecology,
and promote interdisciplinary, interinstitutional, transregional and even global digital humanities
[19]
research and practice by researchers in various fields . The field of the library, information and
archives needs to assume the mission and responsibility of developing digital humanities, actively
grasp the opportunity of digital humanities research, give play to the advantages of professional
knowledge, technology application, professional talents and professional organization, strengthen
interdisciplinary communication and cooperation, and help promote theoretical innovation,
knowledge innovation, disciplinary innovation and method innovation in the field of humanities.
At the same time, we should learn from the existing evaluation research results and practical
experience to lead the evaluation of digital humanities results.

Reference

[1 ] BERRY D M. Understanding digital humanities[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2012.
[2 ] CUI F J. Exploring digital humanities[J]. Cross Cultural Studies, 2019(2): 210-276. (崔凤娇. 探索数字
人文[J]. 跨文化研究, 2019(2): 210-276. )
[ 3 ] XU M M, SHAO B. Context, problems and enlightenment of digital humanities development in
China[J]. Library Science Research, 2020(14): 2-10. (许苗苗, 邵波. 我国数字人文发展的脉络、问题
及启示[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2020(14): 2-10. )
[4 ] ZHOU W J. The ordering of knowledge resources and the basis of structured knowledge resources for
digital humanities: an analysis based on knowledge map and cognitive structure theory[J]. Information
and Data Work, 2020(6): 79-87. (周文杰. 知识资源的序化与数字人文的结构化知识资源基础——
基于知识地图和认知结构学说的解析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020(6): 79-87. )
[ 5 ] ZENG L, WANG X G, FAN W. Smart data in the field of library archives and its role in digital
humanities research[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2018(1): 17-34. (曾蕾, 王晓光, 范炜. 图档
博领域的智慧数据及其在数字人文研究中的角色[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018(1): 17-34. )
[ 6 ] BERRY D M, FAGERJORD A. Digital humanities: knowledge and criticism in the digital age[M].
WANG X G, et al, trans. Dalian: Northeast University of Finance and Economics Press, 2019. (贝里,
费格约德. 数字人文: 数字时代的知识与批判[M]. 王晓光, 等, 译. 大连: 东北财经大学出版社,
2019. )
[7 ] XIANG L, XU T, TAN T, et al. Dialogue between numbers and literature: summary of the seminar on