Page 87 - Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.45, 2019
P. 87

086   Journal of Library Science in China, Vol.11, 2019



            current patterns of reading behavior. In order to better comb through the reading behavior patterns,
            we analyzed and compared the characteristics of the four classifications at each stage of reading
            behavior.
              First of all, in the pre-reading stage, the way of traditional readers to find the reading target is
            more single. They pay more attention to the acquisition of paper books. However, high-engaged
            hybrid readers will often use a variety of channels and put more efforts to set reading goals, giving
            consideration to the access of paper books and e-books.
              On the one hand, traditional readers generally “find reading targets based on reading content
            preferences” in the choice of reading targeting factors, and are not affected by other factors such
            as “peer influence” and “book list recommendation”. High-engaged hybrid readers take full
            advantage of a variety of reading targeting channels to discover reading targets and do more to
            target reading goals (see Figure 1). On the other hand, in the access to books, traditional readers
            and passive hybrid readers often conduct the paper books-related acquisition behavior, rarely
            related to the e-book acquisition behavior, while the standard hybrid readers and high-engaged
            hybrid readers usually conduct the acquisition behavior about paper books and e-books equally
            (see Figure 2). In other words, traditional readers and passive hybrid readers are more interested in
            paper books, while standard hybrid readers and high-engaged hybrid readers take into account both
            two channels.


                                  5SBEJUJPOBM 3FBEFST   1BTTJWF )ZCSJE 3FBEFST
                                  4UBOEBSE )ZCSJE 3FBEFST  )JHI FOHBHFE )ZCSJE 3FBEFST

                                              1FFS *OGMVFODF

                      3FBEJOH $POUFOU 1SFGFSFODFT                3FDPNNFOEFE




                         #PPL "QQFBSBODF                               *EPM &GGFDU





                        0UIFS 'PSNT PG #PPL                          #PPL SFDPNNFOEBUJPOT



                                  4PDJBM .FEJB )FBU        #PPL 3BOLJOHT
                     Figure 1. Differences in targeting behavior performance of four classifications of adolescents
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92